Abortion Is Morally Wrong - 1682 Words

Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by removal of the fetus from the mother’s womb. It is estimated that there are 30-40 million abortions conducted a year (Trupin). Abortions have been legal in the United States since the Supreme Court’s decision in the 1973 Roe v. Wade case, however there is still a major controversy surrounding abortion as to whether or not abortions are morally acceptable. While some argue that abortion is morally impermissible, as it involves the killing of a fetus, others will contend that abortions are morally acceptable because the fetus is not a rationale human being. When discussing the controversy of abortions, common questions revolve around the moral status of the fetus, and the rights of the woman. Prominent philosophers such as Judy Jarvis Thomson and Don Marquis have opposing stances on the issues. Thomson comes to the conclusion that abortion is morally permissible based on a series of analogies and thought experiments focusing o n women’s rights. Unlike Thomson, Marquis argues that abortion is morally wrong except in extreme cases, based off of his reasoning of why killing is wrong. This paper will first reconstruct Marquis’ argument, and then argue that his argument is weak because it contains flaws that makes his conclusion invalid. In his article â€Å"Why Abortion is Immoral,† Don Marquis attempts to develop a general argument that concludes abortions and killing an adult human are morally the same, so the majority of abortionsShow MoreRelatedIs Abortion Morally Wrong?1397 Words   |  6 PagesAbortion is viewed as an ethical issue worldwide as it has many debates which causes question: Should it be considered morally ethical or not? Should it be legal or illegal? Is it wrong, is it, right? In addition to multiple theories: Beliefs, Morality, Logic, Science and many others. Some argue that abortion is morally wrong because it has a right to life. While the opposing view believe th at its morally correct because it holds no right to life. The text â€Å"The Deliberately Induced Abortion ofRead MoreAbortion Is Morally Wrong Or Not? Essay1234 Words   |  5 Pages230 abortion restrictions enacted by states in the US. In 2016 alone, there has been 1,256 provisions relating to sexual and reproductive health and rights. Of these 1,256, 445 provisions attempted to restrict access to abortion services (Nas, E., Benson Gold, R., Ansari-Thomas, Z., Cappello, O., Mohammed, L., 2016). Women’s rights as a human and as a US citizen are being violated through these restrictions. There is currently a strong disagreement in the US as to whether abortion is morally wrongRead MoreIs Abortion Morally Wrong?1704 Words   |  7 Pagessociety is how the legalities apply to the process of abortion. In this debate, most people usually connect with either the â€Å"pro-life† argument, or the â€Å"pro-choice† argument. Before developing a position, it is important to understand both sides of the argument and weigh the consequences of each. The common ground between the two is often mistaken, making it difficult for people to find their position. People who support banishing legal abortions are usually referred to as â€Å"pro-lifers.† They usuallyRead MoreAbortion Is Morally Wrong?1206 Words   |  5 PagesAbortion is one of the most divisive, controversial issues in today’s culture. Generally, there are two main stances one may take regarding the issue. However, many people hold views that are less extreme and do not favor one position or the other. One philosopher, Don Marquis, is against abortion in his essay, â€Å"Why Abortion is Immoral.† He opens his paper with the statement that the view of abortion as seriously immoral has not received much support, while the anti-abortion position is supportedRead MoreIs Abortion Morally Wrong? Essay1372 Words   |  6 Pagesten of these end in abortion† (Guttmacher Institute). Although today the United States is split among many controversial issues, one of the most disputed controversies is abortion, which has taken our country by storm over the last decade. As more and more unexpected pregnancies are occurring, many women find themselves faced with the financial and social burdens of potentially raising a child. Helpless and faced with a life- changing dilemma, these women turn to abortion as their only choiceRead MoreAbortion Is Morally Wrong?2405 Words   |  10 Pages Introduction We can all agree that abortion is a controversial issue debated in our society today, especially in Texas, which is one of the most conservative’s states in the nation. Some people argue that abortion is morally wrong, because it has to do with ending a life which, according proponents begins at conception, not at birth. Others contest that it is a woman s constitutional right to make reproductive decisions, particularly in situations of rape, incest, and health risks. In this paperRead MoreIs Abortion Morally Wrong?3071 Words   |  13 Pages Abortion -Final Mariel Timothy Howard University October 2014 Abortion, according to dictionary.com (2014) is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of pregnancy. When it comes to abortion many ethical issues, and questions become a great concern. Some questions of great concern are: is abortion morally wrong? Should abortion be illegal? Is the fetus an innocent person? What’s the right of the motherRead MoreWhy abortion is morally wrong1412 Words   |  6 Pagesyou slice it, abortion is morally wrong. Although that should not be misinterpreted for a pro-life stance on abortion because there are numerous circumstances that must be considered in each situation. Just because abortion is morally impermissible, it does not mean that society will deem you a bad person for getting an abortion under extreme circumstances. For that reason, abortion is a specifically tricky topic to discuss. There is no clear-cut answer as to whether or not abortion should be allowedRead MoreIs Abortion M orally Wrong?867 Words   |  4 Pagesopportunity to have an abortion rather than giving birth, and raising your child. An abortion can happen in practically two ways, the pill, which deteriorates the non-living fetus, or the physical way where doctors pull out the fetus with medical tongs. Parenting is having the child and raising them as your own till they are a legal adult at eighteen years old. The United States is quite divided on the topic, and choice of abortion. Nearly half think abortion is utterly wrong and should not be a choiceRead MoreWhy Abortion Is Morally Wrong1559 Words   |  7 PagesIMPORTANCE OF THE TOPIC: The morality of abortion is a topic that has long been discussed by both those for and against the act. Until 1972 when the Supreme Court case of Roe v. Wade made abortion legal in all 50 states, the act of getting an abortion was illegal in many states. Both sides of the moral arguments explain the reasoning behind their arguments. The moral question is if the act of getting an abortion is the same as murdering another human being. YES ARGUMENT PATRICK LEE AND ROBERT P

The Great Gatsby Selfish Analysis - 1304 Words

Beautifully Selfish Henry Ford once said, â€Å"Money does not change men, it merely unmasks them. If a man is naturally selfish or arrogant or greedy, the money brings that out, that’s all.† Ford explains how money gives naturally selfish people the freedom to be themselves. When a person is poor they often times are not allowed to act themselves because they do not have the money to reinforce their actions. This theme is evident in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel The Great Gatsby because money allows people in the novel to show their true colors. For example, Daisy is extremely selfish because she owns a lot of money. Her selfishness is proven through her lack of interest in other people, her affair, and how she discards people without a care.†¦show more content†¦Furthermore, Daisy also lacks an interest in her daughter because she rarely talks about her; she is only seen interacting with her daughter once in the novel. â€Å"Afterward he kept looking at the child with surprise. I don’t think he had ever really believed in its existence before† (Fitzgerald 117). This quote explains how surprised Gatsby was to see Daisy’s child because Daisy rarely interacts with her daughter. Daisy only cares about her child when it is fitting for her. The child clearly wants her mothers attention, however, she only gets attention from Daisy when guests are around. Daisy is allowed to lack interest when it comes to her daughter because she has enough money to hire a nanny. Therefore, Daisy’s money allows for her to be selfish and not spend as much time with her daughter. Instead, Daisy spends most of her time with Gatsby during the affair. Another prominent way Daisy shows her selfishness when she has an affair with Gatsby. Daisy’s beauty and money often times allows people, like Gatsby, to overlook her selfishness. Thus, Daisy rekindles her romance with Gatsby and fails to recognize that the affair might destroy G atsby’s life. The affair leads to Gatsby stopping his huge parties, firing most of his servants, and eventually, it leads to Gatsby’s death. Daisy does not seem to possess any care of the impact the affair has on Gatsby’s life because she doesShow MoreRelatedThe Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald1463 Words   |  6 PagesThe Great Gatsby? People hear this title and think of the movie, the movie that got 351 dollars worldwide. The movie directed by Buz Luhrmann and the movie with a story line that follows a book. What book? Of course it has the same title. Written in 1925 by F. Scott Fitzgerald, â€Å"The Great Gatsby† the book has have been people reading the novel to this day. In the book, there are so many layers that need to be peeled in order to analysis the deeper meanings of the book. psychoanalysis therorism doesRead MoreThe Great Gatsby Character Analysis956 Words   |  4 PagesIn the book, The Great Gatsby, written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the re is a strong message about the social class systems about the societies that exists between them. First, there are people like the Buchanans and Jordan Baker who were born into wealth and never really had to work for their money. Secondly, The new money people who can never really be like them, inherently because they have had to work for their money and sometimes finding it had been rough while doing so. (Houghton Mifflin) InRead MoreThe Great Gatsby As A Vampire Analysis919 Words   |  4 Pagesthey be fictional or nonfictional, can be considered a vampire through analysis of certain character traits. One literary work with a character who lends himself exceedingly well to Foster’s version of a vampire is The Great Gatsby. In The Great Gatsby, Jay Gatsby is like a vampire in that he uses Dan Cody to get money, Nick to get close to Daisy, and, ultimately, Daisy to achieve social status. In order to determine that Jay Gatsby is like a vampire, the definition of a vampire must be made clear.Read MoreF. Scott Fitzgerald s The Great Gatsby1583 Words   |  7 Pages F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby is renowned for its intricacy as well as the vast levels of symbolism that are present within it. The multitude of symbols allows for many interpretations of The relationships that take place within F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, when viewed through a psychoanalytic perspective, are seen as being hindered by each character’s aversion to emotional intimacy and their personal insecurities. Tom and Daisy Buchanan’s relationship is based not on a desireRead MoreSophia Diep . Mrs. Ploeger . English 3, P. 6. 8 March 2017.1197 Words   |  5 PagesSophia Diep Mrs. Ploeger English 3, P. 6 8 March 2017 The Great Gatsby Character Analysis Essay Outline Thesis: In The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald shows the corruption of material wealth through the empty life of Daisy Buchanan. I. F. Scott Fitzgerald weaves white and yellow to present a contrast between Daisy s purity and her actual corruption by materialism. A. Daisy is associates with the color of white, from her young age to now, she dressed in white, and had a little white roadsterRead MoreThe Theme Of Dissatisfaction In The Great Gatsby990 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The Great Gatsby† is a novel of dissatisfaction, as it is seen peppered throughout the actions of the characters. The state of discontent is essential to the development of the complex plot, as well as the various personalities of the novel. Generally, the lack of complacency enveloping each character, has resulted in senseless actions of coping, and attempts to fulfill the emptiness where their pride belongs. The novel portrays life in New York City in the early 1920s, conveying the glamorousRead MoreAnalysis Of The Great Gatsby By F. Scott Fitzgerald1076 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"The Great Gatsby†: An Analysis of Gatsby’s and Daisy’s Relationship The roaring twenties was a time of freedom, wealth, romance, and innovation. Many significant advances in history occurred in the 1920’s, such as the invention of the automobile. Women gained many freedoms during this time. The most known betterment was women gaining the right to vote, and starting to obtain more freedom and respect in the world of politics. However, women seemed to still be suppressed in the social aspect of theRead MoreDisillusion of Great Gatsby2876 Words   |  12 PagesGatsby’s† American Dream in The Great Gatsby The disillusionment of the American Dream is a frequent but important written theme in the American literature. Fitzgerald’s famous book The Great Gatsby is one of the most important representative works that reflects this theme. F. Scott Fitzgerald is best known for his novels and short stories which chronicle the excesses of Americas Jazz Age during the 1920s. His classic twentieth-century story of Jay Gatsby examines and critiques Gatsbys particularRead MoreFailure Of The American Dream In The Writings Of F. Scott Fitzgerald, Zora Neale Hurston, And August Wilson1418 Words   |  6 PagesThis literary study will define the failure of the †American Dream† in the writings of F. Scott Fitzgerald, Arthur Miller, Zora Neale Hurston, and August Wilson. Fitzgerald’s account of the Jay Gatsby s rise to fame in the 1920s defines the failure of financial success as part of the American Dream. Gatsby will eventually die due to his excessive greed, which is not unlike the emotional death of Willy Loman as he fails to become a successful salesman in Author Miller’s Death of a Salesman. More soRead MoreGender Roles in The Great Gatsby2970 Words   |  12 PagesWomen In The Great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald, author of The Great Gatsby, illustrates most women in his novels in a incredibly negative light. He portrays them as dependent upon men, selfish, and completely amoral. Jay Gatsby is in love with the wealthy Mrs. Daisy Buchannan and tries to win her love by proving that he is wealthy. However, no matter how wealthy he becomes, or how many gigantic parties he throws, he is still never good enough for Daisy. The story ends in tragedy as Gatsby is killed

Human Stories Value

Question: Discuss the evidence he uses to support his argument? Give specific examples. Discuss the value of the human stories Mooney uses to develop his argument. Do you think Mooney's use of these stories helps to support his argument, or do they weaken his argument? Why/why not? Answer: Introduction: Mooney has been verified as an accommodation, although once he was a really vociferous skeptic. At that point, alongside Matt Nesbit, he found "confining," and chose that alongside the National Center for Science Education, the National Academies of Science, and other accommodations masses that you couldn't offer development of the American open on the off chance that you either touted skepticism or faulted creationism for religion. (Fussell Anderson, 1988) No, we should no matter what abstain from raising the temper of the devoted, for they are as meager kids: on the off chance that they sense that their confidence is assaulted, they turn out to be totally vaccinated to Darwin. (Grasso, Rahwan, Reed Simari, 2010) Human Stories Mooney Uses to Develop His Argument Obviously creationism is one of the littlest issues made by religion, and at any rate in the event that we truly need creationism out of our schools and our nation, we should first debilitate the hold of those religions that reject Darwinism. Although Mooney restricts advancement and religion in his title, he will assert that they're still good. Furthermore, he's not proposing in that title that faith in God advances dismissal of development, despite the fact that that is the truth, a certainty one can gather from Mooney's examination. What he's recommending is, truth be told, that people have hard-wired mental attributes that keep them from tolerating developing. Despite the fact that it's not a fortuitous event that large portions of these components are those that advance religion, Mooney doesn't stress that conclusion.(Mortensen, 1982) Mooney's Use of Stories Helps to Support His Argument Mooney demonstrates that Right wing about history, financial aspects, science, and so on are not just individual oversights, yet rather untruths are rational frameworks of distortions that are intended to serve individual mental needs and additionally particular political and religious purposes. (Provis, 2004) Really, Mooney is guaranteeing that we all do that, however, he tries to demonstrate that Republicans are more shocking at it than liberals. Mooney concedes that large portions of these are great attributes, yet cautions that they still must be taken after with alert. The system of beginning with what you need to trust, then discovers legitimization for those convictions without a decent arrangement of addressing and a decent arrangement of uncertainty is a dangerous thing to do. (Reed Rowe, 2005)Republicans tend not to regard this notice, while liberals, being offspring of the Enlightenment, or at any rate to some degree better at it. One critical inquiry regarding the Republican party is whether there is any sizable gathering of Republicans who don't fit Mooney's meaning of unbending, dictator, and stubborn. Also, whether that gathering is sufficiently vast to impact the course of the Republican Party, its voters, and its legislators. If not, and since shaping an outsider in the U.S., which hosts systematized the two-gathering framework, appears to be inconceivable, we may be screwed over thanks to a useless two-gathering framework for quite a while. (Reed Wells, 2007) It's impossible that you would get a sufficient sizable number to make it a practical political gathering in the U.S. what's more, Since the radicals have more impact in essential and preparatory decisions, it's impossible that direct Republicans would be given moderate lawmakers to vote in favor of, and As a result of existing organizations and standardized principles, there is little any desire for breathing life and practicality into such other or chip party. (Swoyer Walton, 2001) Why are Mooney's cases that there are physiological and physical contrasts between traditionalist brains and liberal brains so vital? Since, if those distinctions are physical, then those distinctions can be acquired. What's more, if acquired, it's feasible that they are not learned or gained. Also, if that is genuine, then the probability that they can be modified is low, which ought to guide liberals endeavor to impact preservationists. Citing David Brooks in the aforementioned article: "It's likely useless to attempt to change current Republicans." These are, all things considered, bedrock standards with "profound memorable and mental roots", regardless of the possibility that you don't acknowledge Mooney's contention that they are inserted in physiological mind structures. (Wells Reed, 2008) One critical new condition is that preservationists and liberals and every one of us have media outlets that we can, and normally do swing to that strengthen and backing what we effectively need to accept. That is prone to increment later on, and it makes this issue all the more hard to explain. This is not an adjusted change those who get their news from Fox news are more misled. Maybe an easier method to review the majority of this is to say that convictions are "sticky". They're difficult to change for a mixed bag of reasons: we're protective about being demonstrated to not be right; after time, our lives are each composed around those convictions in different ways, so that transforming them would be troublesome; and as Mooney contends, there are likely physiological structures behind those convictions, structures that would be hard if not difficult to change. What to do: Be more moderate in the feeling of being all the more firm at indicating and talking about reality, investigative truth, and so forth. Create an option story and stay with it. Stop trusting or tolerating that the two sides are equivalent, and act as needs be. One perspective that Mooney does not consider finally, and maybe that he ought not, is the likelihood that positions held by people on a few issues are not planned to be discerning as in those holding these positions hope to give contemplated contentions in backing of them, whether are motivated thinking or generally. Essentially, a few positions held by a few people are ridiculous and contenting. It's not simple, as Mooney contends, that contemplated contention are not compelling on the grounds that they are countered with propelled thinking; it's that the reaction demonstrates an absence of enthusiasm for giving an answer or reasons by any means. (Fussell Anderson, 1988) Conclusion Mooney prescribes those liberals "locate some key certainties, the best truths, and coordinate them into stories that move individuals". Truly, what sort of stories does he think may move somebody who trusts that fetus removal is homicide or somebody who trusts that creationism is genuine in light of the fact that it is expected to look after her/his vital religious convictions or somebody who feels that weapon possession ought not be limited in view of his reasons for alarm of an oppressive government? Perhaps, those stories, adequate and if told frequently enough by enough individuals, may have some sort of continuous, directing impact. (Mortensen, 1982) References Fussell, E., Anderson, C. (1988). Style as Argument: Contemporary American Nonfiction.American Literature,60(1), 154. Grasso, F., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G. (2010). Introducing Argument Computation.Argument Computation,1(1), 1-5. Mortensen, C. (1982). A Mistaken Argument.The Philosophical Quarterly,32(129), 358. Provis, C. (2004). Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument.Argumentation,18(1), 95-112. Reed, C., Rowe, G. (2005). Translating Toulmin Diagrams: Theory Neutrality in Argument Representation. Argumentation, 19(3), 267-286. Reed, C., Wells, S. (2007). Dialogical Argument as an Interface to Complex Debates. IEEE Intell. Syst., 22(6), 60-65. Swoyer, C., Walton, D. (2001). The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. The Philosophical Review, 110(2), 291. Wells, S., Reed, C. (2008). Using dialogical argument as an interface to complex debates. IEEE Potentials, 27(5), 26-30.

Tobacco Advertising Essays (761 words) - Tobacco, Smoking

Tobacco Advertising Tobacco Advertising and its dangerous effects on young people. Everyday 3,000 children start smoking, most them between the ages of 10 and 18. These kids account for 90 percent of all new smokers. In fact, 90 percent of all adult smokers said that they first lit up as teenagers (Roberts). These statistics clearly show that young people are the prime target in the tobacco wars. The cigarette manufacturers may deny it, but advertising and promotion play a vital part in making these facts a reality (Roberts). The kings of these media ploys are Marlboro and Camel. Marlboro uses a fictional western character called The Marlboro Man, while Camel uses Joe Camel, a high-rolling, swinging cartoon character. Joe Camel, the "smooth character" from R.J. Reynolds, who is shown as a dromedary with complete style has been attacked by many Tobacco-Free Kids organizations as a major influence on the children of America. Dr. Lonnie Bristow, AMA (American Medical Association) spokesman, remarks that "to kids, cute cartoon characters mean that the product is harmless, but cigarettes are not harmless. They have to know that their ads are influencing the youth under 18 to begin smoking"(Breo). Researchers at the Medical College of Georgia report that almost as many 6-year olds recognize Joe Camel as know Mickey Mouse (Breo). That is very shocking information for any parent to hear. The industry denies that these symbols target people under 21 and claim that their advertising goal is simply to promote brand switching and loyalty. Many people disagree with this statement such as Illinois Rep. Richard Durbin who states " If we can reduce the number of young smokers, the tobacco companies will be in trouble and they know it "(Roberts). So what do the tobacco companies do to keep their industry alive and well? Seemingly, they go toward a market that is not fully aware of the harm that cigarettes are capable of. U.S. News recently featured a discussion of the smoking issue with 20 teenagers from suburban Baltimore. The group consisted of ten boys and ten girls between the ages of 15 and 17. When asked why they started smoking, they gave two contradictory reasons: They wanted to be a part of a peer group. They also wanted to reach out and rebel at the same time. " When you party, 75 to 90 percent of the kids are smoking. It makes you feel like you belong," says Devon Harris, a senior at Woodlawn High. Teens also think of smoking as a sign of independence. The more authority figures tell them not to smoke, the more likely they are to pick up the habit (Roberts). The surprising thing is that these kids know that they are being influenced by cigarette advertising. If these kids know that this advertising is manipulating them, why do they still keep smoking? The ads are everywhere, especially in teen-oriented magazines, such as Rolling Stone and Spin. The ads also fuel some of the reasons the children gave for starting. They represent rebellion, independence, acceptance and happiness. These are all the things a young person, between childhood and adolescence, needs and desires. This type of advertising, on top of peer pressure, is the mystery behind the rise in adolescent smoking. How do we stop the future of America from smoking? Here are three things that the experts recommend. Try to convince your children that smoking is not cool. Talk to your kids at a young age about the dangers of smoking. Identify family members who smoke and ask them to stop (Thomas). Children are the most valuable commodity we are given in life. Let's try to educate them while they're young to be independent thinkers and to not be swayed by the tobacco companies who are trying to take advantage of their mind and body. Works Cited "Bill Clinton vs. Joe Camel." U.S. News & World Report. 2 Sep. 1996: 12. Infotrac. Online. 27 Oct. 1996. "Selling Tobacco to Kids." America. 17 Feb. 1996: 3. Infotrac. Online. 27 Oct. 1996. Roberts, Steven. " Teens on tobacco; kids smoke for reasons all their own." U.S. News & World Report. 18 Apr. 1996: 38. Infotrac. Online. 27 Oct. 1996. Thomas, Roger E. "10 steps to keep the children in your